About Me

Name: (Jimmie) Blackhawke
Email: jimmiehollis@comcast.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

HMMMMMMMMMMMMM

1. My wife uses a scented fabric softener in our dryer. I never knew why she did that. But I got a hint one day when I was standing at a food counter and several women walked up to me, sniffed me and walked away saying, “Forget it he is married.” You can take off the wedding band but it is hard to get that April fresh scent out of your clothes.
2. I don’t think prisoners should be given free room and board. They should be required to run on a treadmill all day to generate electricity for the prison----and those who refuse to work, can rest in the chair that is hooked up to the treadmill.
3. Tom, a friend has a very corny greeting on his answering machine that says, “Hi, I am out now, enjoying the day, at the beep leave a message and don’t forget to share the love.” He got a message one day from his doctor who said” Tom, this is Dr. Mills, your test results are back, you have VD, so stop sharing the love.”

4. You know it is cold out when you see a lawyer with his hands in his own pockets.

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS.
You are a Democrat, you have two cows, and your neighbor has none. You feel guilty for being successful so you vote in a bunch of liberals and they put a tax on your cows, forcing you to sell one to raise the money for the tax. The people you put into office takes your tax money, buy a cow and give it to your neighbor. You feel good and righteous and Barbara Streisand sings for you.

You are a Republican, you have two cows, and your neighbor has none.
SO..??????!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

JUST SAYING..!

1. WE HAVE ENOUGH YOUTH; WE NEED A FOUNTAIN OF SMART.
2. “CRIMINAL LAWYER” IS A REDUNDANCY.
3. THE GENE POOL COULD USE SOME CHLORINE.
4. “CONSCIOUSNESS,” THAT ANNOYING TIME BETWEEN NAPS.
5. SUICIDAL TWIN KILLS SISTER BY MISTAKE.
6. WHY IS IT WE PARK ON A DRIVEWAY BUT DRIVE ON A PARKWAY?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A thorough investigation of ACORN must be done.

The Association of Community Organization for Reform Now (ACORN) is an organization that continues to come under intense fire. It is alleged, and proven in some case, to commit corruption and other criminal activities. But is this organization a breeding ground for criminal activities or are Republicans and some Democrats targeting it for political purposes?
Should ACORN, deemed friendly to Democrats, undergo the same intense investigation by our Justice Department that was given to other groups that were deemed friendly to the Republicans? In the Washington Beltway this has become a hot issue that is breaking for the most part, along party lines. Most Democrats are against any investigation while most Republicans want one.
ACORN is an organization that receives taxpayer funds. Within such a large group there are bound to be some acts of corruption, criminal behavior, cheating and misuse of funds. Yet because some employees have been found guilty of the charges against them in several cities across the country, it begs the question of whether or not such behavior is systematic, encouraged and/or tolerated by state and local ACORN managers. How deep does the corruption go? What did the managers know and when did they know it?
Politicians on both sides will use the ACORN issue to their advantage. But average citizens, those of us whose taxes go to fund ACORN, have a right to know if this is an organization that is incorrigible, permeated with criminal activity and rife with corruption-----or one that has done nothing that rises to the level of an investigation.
So to clear the air, it would be a wise decision for taxpayers to call for a thorough and immediate investigation into this organization. Alleged and actual fraud, waste and abuse of taxpayer money coupled with criminal activity by any group, conservative or liberal, cannot and should not be tolerated or shielded by our politicians and our Justice Department. An investigation into the inner workings and activities of ACORN is justified. Inaction from this Justice Department will indeed reek of the stench of partisanship and duplicity.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Cuts paid for through Fraud, Waste and abuse?


Fraud, Waste and Abuse in local and federal governments are negatives that are very difficult if not impossible to eradicate. All we have to do is look at how long the fight to curb corruption, fraud and abuse in New Jersey has been going on and yet today these activities are as rampant as ever at all levels of NJ government. The avenues to commit fraud, waste and abuse in NJ are systematic and deeply ingrained. One can only imagine the amount of taxpayer’s money that could be saved if fraud, waste and abuse could be eradicated.
So at the federal level, when President Obama tell senior citizens that he will pay for his billion dollars cuts to Medicare through rooting out and stopping fraud, waste and abuse, I am skeptical. His cuts would happen immediately but the “savings” through stopping fraud, waste and abuse, will happen over many years if at all. This will mean immediate rationing of healthcare for senior citizens. Medicare is already in trouble and now the president want to take even more money from the program.
Senior citizens, even those who voted for Obama, have to look beyond partisan politics and decide if they would be better off under the proposals by the Obama administration. Seniors understand that healthcare reforms are needed, but are there better and more effective ways to do these reforms? Should the whole healthcare system be scrapped or should we target only those areas that need reforming? And what about the millions if not billions that could be saved through tort reform?
Those on the left share this president’s vision for our country. Others in the country are very skeptical and wary of his proposals and propensity towards socialism. Seniors could very well be the largest group of casualties if Obama’s healthcare proposals become law. The older generation has an earned reputation of being deliberative and wise-----the healthcare issue is a very critical test of that earned reputation.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Czar Mendacity

The word “Czar” or Tsar” is foreign to most Americans. However, those who have studied Russian history, is familiar with the word. President Obama has appointed over 30 Czars and all of them are exempt from scrutiny by Congress and the American people. The liberal media is not interested in scrutinizing these Czars as their findings might embarrass the president.
Representative Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.), member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, called for President Obama’s Czars, or appointed high level advisers to testify before Congress about their “ authority and responsibilities” in the executive branch. McHenry said, “The president’s Czars have become a point of controversy among his opponents because they do not have to be confirmed by the Senate as cabinet-level officials do. McHenry wrote to committee chairman Edolphus Towns (D-N.Y.) and ranking member Darrell Issa (R-Cal), asking the appointed officials to testify. “If the Czars have high-level decision making authority as their titles would indicate, then it is my concern that their appointment without Senate approval represents a circumvention of our Constitutionally-mandated confirmation process.”
Americans need to know who these Czars are, what makes them tick and what exactly are their job functions. But most of all how will any of their decisions affect the everyday lives of the people? Were it not for talk radio, conservative and Independent blogs, conservative magazines and some fair and balanced newspapers and cable news, most Americans would not know they existed. The mendacity within this administration is appalling; on the one hand they are attacking our nations Central Intelligence Agency while on the other they are creating a “shadow government of Czars.” We are now seeing the “change” that was promised and it is indeed disgraceful.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bittersweet


A few days ago a black gentleman from my city said that despite my conservatism even I, as a black man, must get a sense of pride seeing a black President of the United States. I told him that the election of Barrack Obama as President of the United States was very bittersweet for me then as it is today.
It says a lot about our nation that a black man could be elected to such a high office, but at the same time there is a serious down side to his election. The left touts his election as a historical event of huge magnitude, and rightly so if his being black is the only consideration. But with the man comes his politics and Obama’s political views are so far left that they will eventually do more harm to the nation than healing-----and therein lay the bittersweet taste for me.
Yes, as an American of African ancestry I take cautious pride in Obama’s election as president, but as a conservative I have very deep concerns and disagreements with his far left politics. Equally, I would also be just as concerned if he was too far right in his views. The unknowable for our nation is whether or not it can survive the ravages of his march towards socialism.
I doubt any president comes into office wanting to be a failure, but if Obama continues down the liberal road he is now traveling, allowing his presidency to be run by far left Congressional leaders, then I think history will judge him as one of America’s worse presidents.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Capitalism, America's System

In a nut shell, capitalism is a political and economic system in which a country’s trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state; and socialism is a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
The friction between the two systems is obvious, each with nuances that have emerged over the centuries.
Capitalism is the system that made America a super power. But raw capitalism has a down side, and that is not everyone will or can take advantage of the system. These are the people who are usually left behind emotionally, financially and economically. While true, some would argue that capitalism also provides opportunities, avenues of education, and upward mobility for anyone who wishes to take advantage of them. History is rife with those who have accessed those opportunities and pulled themselves up, rose above poverty, and went on to become successful in life. But not everyone will make that journey. For a myriad of reason many people remain at or below a level of subsistence that sharply contrasts the affluent and prosperous complexion of capitalism.
In order to ease the disparity between the “haves and have-nots” various social programs over the decades were instituted thereby planting the seeds of socialism. At conception a social program was not seen as a “right” but as the compassionate efforts, generosity, and yes a sense of guilt, of a nation that cared for those considered the least among us.
However, the seeds of socialism grew rapidly over the decades and were nourished and watered by the actions of social advocates and political activists using mostly taxpayer’s money. Soon promoting and accessing social welfare programs became a “right” and the drive for wealth redistribution became the clarion call for those who saw capitalism as the enemy of the people and socialism as the model for change.
Today socialism is overtly challenging capitalism and the friction caused by the differences has caused severe divisions within society. Usually such extreme levels of tensions over differences lead to civil war in other nations and once even led to a civil war in America. Those who advocate replacing capitalism with socialism are finding support among many of those who have remained at or below a low level of subsistence and who have turned their backs on the “American dream.”
But socialists have encountered a growing and powerful backlash from opponents of socialism. From reports and news stories, neither capitalist nor socialists have any intention of backing down from this very tense confrontation, and therein lies the dangers to our national security and credibility. One system must be defeated, equal sharing of power is not an option nor desirable by many in our society.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Courtesy, Respect and Civility


Racial profiling made headlines again recently when Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr. was arrested by police in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

A neighbor reported seeing two men forcing their way into the Gates home. Gates, arriving back from a trip abroad, had his driver help try to force open a broken door. Gates' arrest came not from this, but for angrily yelling at the responding officers and suggesting racial bias.

All this reminded me of my own past brushes with the law.

Early one July evening in 1964, in Little Rock, Arkansas, I was on my way to visit a friend in North Little Rock when I was pulled over by the sheriff. He was white, middle-aged, beer-bellied and very southern.

I had an Illinois drivers' license. The car, which belonged to a friend, was registered in Michigan. I also had my U.S. Air Force identification.

If ever there was a time to worry, it was then.

I was respectful and courteous, as I was raised to be. The sheriff said he stopped me for going the wrong way on a one-way street. I explained I was a visitor and apologized for my mistake. With that, he gave me a big grin and asked where I was going. I told him, and he pointed me in the right direction. He told me to take it easy and watch the street signs.

I didn't get a ticket.

Years later, on a rainy October night in 1976, I was driving out of New York after returning from Germany when I was pulled over by a state trooper. The trooper inquired about my green USAF license plates, and I explained they were issued to military personnel serving in Germany.

Again, I was respectful and courteous. I provided the necessary documents.

The trooper asked me to step out of the car and waved me back to his cruiser. Once inside, he asked what unit I was in and how long I was abroad. It turned out he was previously stationed in Germany with the Army not far from where I served.

The trooper said he stopped me for speeding, and pointed out the national speed limit became 55 miles per hour while I was away. He welcomed me back, we shook hands and he told me to slow down.

Again, I received no ticket.

Then there was November of 1988 in New Jersey. I was going to the Cape May Coast Guard Station for the first time when a local officer stopped me. Noting my Air Force hat and coat, the officer asked if I was in the military, and I explained I just retired. The officer smiled. He told me I was going the wrong way down a one-way street.

I was respectful and courteous. I apologized. The officer told me to follow him. He lead me right to the gate of the Coast Guard Station, and waved as he drove off.

Once again, no ticket.

Why did I never get a ticket? Was it my military status or my demeanor? After all, I was in the wrong each time.

As an American of African ancestry, I would like to think it was the latter. Despite being in the military, I could have behaved badly, gotten belligerent and cried racism. Military credentials or not, I would have been in trouble - especially in Little Rock in 1964.

Periodically, as with Professor Gates, charges are made about police targeting minorities simply because they are minorities. That's never happened to me.

Saying that, I'm not so naïve to think abuses don't happen. There are crooked, racist and bigoted cops out there, but I like to think they are the exception rather than the rule.

We rightfully expect police officers to treat us with respect and courtesy. But it's a two-way street. Being kind, courteous and respectful costs nothing, and respect usually begets respect.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMACARE, SENIOR NIGHTMARE?

  I have no idea what is in Obama's health care bill.  I don't think most of the people who will vote on it know either.  Bills are purposely written in a complex manner, mostly by lawyers, to confuse, hide agendas and discourage people from reading and understanding them.  So I can only make a tentative judgement based on what I have heard and read from Democrats, Republicans, Independents, liberals, conservatives and news organizations. I have grave concerns that this bill has hidden clauses and trojan-horse verbiage in it because I have learned not to  trust or believe Democrats over the years.
     I do however believe that somewhere in the thousands of pages and paragraphs and sub-sections of the president's healthcare bill, the very old among us will be treated like 3rd class citizens when it comes to healthcare accessibility.  I believe that seniors will be sent to the back of the bus and put last in line when it comes to treatment.  I believe that the quality of life for seniors will greatly decrease under the Obama plan and “end of life” care will disappear completely.
     Because I have not heard any Democrats (since it is their bill) claim that they have read the bill and can truthfully say that seniors will not be scourged I remain skeptical and cautious.
      A lot of blacks and seniors voted for Obama, but I would say to them not to give him a free pass just because he made promises, nor should you give any president a free pass. I would humbly suggest that blacks take a real hard look at the Cap and Trade issue and all seniors take a hard look at his proposed Healthcare Plan.  An intelligent and  informed citizen is very hard to fool.

BLACKHAWKE
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »